wraithfodder (
wraithfodder) wrote2014-05-29 09:16 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Wow, Stargate gets the reboot
Yup, it's finally happening.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/mgm-warner-bros-launching-stargate-708044 reports that Roland Emmerich, who directed and co-wrote the original film with Dean Devlin, will direct and Devlin will produce.
I get the feeling the reboot will be totally recast, skew younger. I'd love to see the SG-1/Atlantis folk in it, but am not holding out any hope....
But one can dream of cameos...
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Just not my cup of tea.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Meh.
On the other hand, it'll be interesting to see what they actually do. I can't see watching it in the theater, but maybe DVD ... or just lurk on people's reactions and see what they think.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
At least we get something and maybe it will get them to throw us a bone later on for a series movie? We can always hope.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
As a fan all you can do is just look at the TV-verse and the movie-verse as two completely separate entities. Its the best way to preserve one's sanity.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
However, as an SG1-verse fan, I do not wish the series or its characters to be brought into it at all. I'm well aware of Emmerich and Devlin's opinion of the series and I think it would be deeply hypocritical of them to cash in on the love there is for those characters after reviling the show for so long. (I mean, you could even say these new films do that because if it weren't for the success of the shows, they probably wouldn't be getting the chance to do this.)
no subject
Right now I can't imagine anyone other than James Spader and Kurt Russell / Michael Shanks and Richard Dean Anderson as Daniel and Jack, so I guess I'm curious but not overly enthusiastic about this development.
(no subject)