Jason Momoa of Stargate Atlantis is featured on page 10 of the U.S. June 23rd TV GUIDE on 'top 10 breaking news.' However, most of us know that Jason .... oh, hmm, just in case, under the cut!
Yes, he cut his dreads but his head and neck were hurting from the weight of the dreads. He added that all that hair kept him from wearing a bike helmet and kept ruining his balance on a surfboard. Eek! but SciFi execs didn't want him to cut it so now he's got a wig.
.
.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 07:54 pm (UTC)Why couldn't SciFi let him cut his hair in BT? It would have been such a strong scene for JM and RD.*pouts*
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 08:13 pm (UTC)Julia, 'okay. I didn't know that. I'll be more careful in how I phrase things in the future.' is pretty much the best phrasing, indeed
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 09:00 pm (UTC)When you shut down the conversation, it reads (to me) as sticking fingers in one's ears and refusing to even contemplate the effect of what you've said on others.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 10:22 pm (UTC)And because the other threads have been frozen, I want to point out here that, "well, they always use dreads to signify ass-kicking alien, like that dude on Andromeda or Predator or whatever else" is not an answer to why this particular issue is offensive. It seems to me that it should lead one to stop and think about *why* dark dudes in dreads are so often cast as ass-kicking aliens and whether there's something kind of fucked-up in the idea that non-white signifiers are used as short hand for scary and alien. Instead of just shrugging and saying that's how it's done and perpetuating the offense.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 10:41 pm (UTC)No one is saying you're a bad person. But every time you trot out the argument "It doesn't matter, it's just a fictional character", every time you defend the person who made the non-human comment because "she didn't mean it" and yet freeze threads when anyone tries to defend themselves against her, every time you accuse someone of being over-sensitive -- those are racist things to say and do. I know it's your journal, but you are behaving just like every racist clod who comes barging into every discussion of bias in the media and makes it impossible to talk about this sort of thing without accusations of "oversensitivity" and intentionality flying around like a hailstorm.
Trust me, I have been that racist clod. My shining Moment Of Stupidity was arguing with Pam Noles about the recasting on Earthsea. ("Glacierdust" is a pseud that I used to use for my personal LJ; it's been renamed to my real name since then, in case you were wondering wtf is up with that.) It's memorialized forever; the Internet doesn't forget, and I'm glad, because there's always Google to remind me that sometimes I need to shut up and listen a little bit rather than charging into a discussion with guns blazing and my bias hanging out all over the place. That exchange with Pam was what helped to break me out of my sheltered corner of the world and made me start listening and learning and paying attention to what people were telling me. (And for the record: I hate admitting to that particular bit of stupidity. I squirm with shame at the mere idea of mentioning it in public, and I'm terrified that people who know me will read that link above and won't like me anymore. Which is exactly why I'm bringing it up here, actually, as a cautionary tale. I can't go back and unsay it; all I can do is try not to be that person in the future and deal with the entirely-deserved flak I've taken for having been that person before.)
I can dig you up some links that were helpful to me in working through my own baggage. (I really need to sit down and collect all of this in one place, darn it...) For starters, from a few things I've bookmarked, here is a good (long) post on fandom and media and representation. Here and here is a two-part discussion of "tone", i.e., does it matter if a fan of color uses the "right" words to point out injustice? And one on how to apologize when you fuck up, because we all do. There are oodles of good links at
And for now, you know what I'd suggest -- you started this, and for your own sake if no one else's, have the integrity to see it through. Stop freezing threads and being dismissive of people who argue against you. Listen to what people are saying and do some reading on your own, and try to understand where their frustration is coming from and why your words and actions are contributing to it. I still feel terrible for what I said to Pam and I can never make it up to her, but in the long run it was a learning experience for me and I think it made me a better and more open-minded person. Maybe this can do that for you -- it doesn't help the people here and now whose concerns you've dismissed, but maybe it can help you not make the same mistakes in the future.
(Sorry about all the edits. This was important and I had to get it into the proper shape.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:02 pm (UTC)My point is that if people have a problem with characters on TV shows being portrayed as aliens because of the color of their skin, the way they speak, or dress, etc., griping here isn't going to change it (nor is taking potshots at each other). If anybody wants to see change, you have to write the producers of a show, and gripe to advertisers.
And I do stand by my remark that dreads were used on the guy on Andromeda (who looks remarkably like Ronon) as well as the alien on PREDATOR (which I already pointed out). That's why they make him look alien. And to my friends who DO have dreads (yes, two do), no, I don't consider them aliens. I never said to the contrary.
And I guess now I'll ask. I have no idea what a PoC is, because I don't pigeonhole people into acronyms...
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:15 pm (UTC)If it was as simple as few letters and complaining to advertisers, dont you think it would already be done?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:20 pm (UTC)Never mind.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:28 pm (UTC)PoC is People of Color. I apologize for using terms that aren't that widely known, but one of the things you'll need to do in order to follow these sorts of discussions is learn the jargon, rather than dismissing it as "pigeonholing". You don't have to use it, but it's useful to know what other people are saying ...
My point is that if people have a problem with characters on TV shows being portrayed as aliens because of the color of their skin, the way they speak, or dress, etc., griping here isn't going to change it (nor is taking potshots at each other). If anybody wants to see change, you have to write the producers of a show, and gripe to advertisers.
Everyone knows that. But that's not what's happening here. The comment that originally got this whole thing going -- and I have no idea who made it or what the exact comment was, since it's been deleted -- was that Ronon's dreds made him look non-human. Since dreadlocks are a traditional non-Western hairstyle and one that's worn by many people with non-Caucasian hair (who still have to deal with cultural norms that are based on hairstyles that just don't work for people with different hair type), that's a horribly insulting, dehumanizing thing to say. Rather than simply letting a racist and insulting comment pass unnoticed, several people spoke up to explain why it was wrong. All that
I can certainly understand not wanting a discussion to explode overnight, but now that you're awake, maybe it would be a good time to unfreeze the threads and allow the conversation to continue.
And I do stand by my remark that dreads were used on the guy on Andromeda (who looks remarkably like Ronon) as well as the alien on PREDATOR (which I already pointed out). That's why they make him look alien.
Then I'll ask again what
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:35 pm (UTC)The reason why I'm coming in here and answering your questions and trying to point out the areas where you're doing yourself harm is because ... well, because I think it's right, for one thing, but more specifically, because I like you and I don't want to see you insulting people and making yourself look bad. Which is what you're doing right now. If you have questions, I'll answer them, but you have to be willing to listen in return.
Dreads vs. non-human argument
Date: 2008-06-17 11:38 pm (UTC)apparently, i'm not done just yet.
Date: 2008-06-17 11:47 pm (UTC)It doesnt.
It's well known, especially among the people of color participating in and watching this thread, that he is Hawaiian and not of African descent.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 11:54 pm (UTC)Dreads vs. non-human argument
Date: 2008-06-18 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-18 12:24 am (UTC)Alien does not mean bad, and never has as far as I know.
Humans have been killing, abusing and discriminating against other human beings and denying their humanity for being "other" (alien, foreign, exotic) for all of human history. Pulling out the dictionary definition of these words says NOTHING about their connotations or the historical baggage associated with them.
I kinda feel like I'm done here. I just don't know what else to say and I don't think you're listening to me at all. Maybe it's because I'm expressing myself badly. I really do hope that when you calm down and back off and get a little distance from this, you'll start doing some reading and begin to understand why people are getting upset at the things you're saying.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-18 12:32 am (UTC)The fact that you associate dreadlocks with 'nonhuman' and 'otherness' is not a good thing, and I don't particularly think that your defense that pointing it out to you isn't going to do any good holds any water. Why? Because the first point that was raised here was that a point of view on the part of a watcher of the show was offensive, not that the use of dreadlocks by the show itself is offensive. Now, the more I think about that particular fact, the more I have objections to it, but that still wasn't the original point.
Right now I really am getting the impression that you are deflecting any discussion about this - changing the focus to the fact that networks are using dreadlocks on alien characters, rather than answering to the fact that someone on your journal stated that they made Ronon more non-human, and you didn't disagree.