The Stargate Atlantis movie
Nov. 24th, 2008 08:16 amThis is from this past week's Burbank, CA Stargate Atlantis convention
http://stargate-sg1-solutions.com/blog/?p=2197
" Rachel Luttrell said no one on the cast has been officially contacted about the Stargate Atlantis movie, and it’s only through the grapevine that they’ve heard it might be filmed next June. So, they are not at the point of negotiating contracts. Both Rachel and David seemed disappointed there was nothing definite yet."
Well, that sucks! Sigh...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 02:28 pm (UTC)Given how they let go of SGA like an old smelly sock and the fact that they keep blaming everything but their own failing for the fact that it didn't do what they wanted (I do wonder what exactly they did want...), I thought for a while that the movie deal wasn't even going to happen.
And then they kept saying it would, but to be honest I still have my doubts. Maybe if the new baby SGU fails (as it is wont to do), they'll realise that throwing out the old isn't always a good idea.
Mind you, if they do a movie along the same line as last week's episode, they might as well do nothing,I'd rather see nothing of Stargate Atlantis than see "the fabulous adventures of the fantastic Jennifer Keller in Atlantis (Stargate, Teyla, John and Ronon optionals... )".
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 02:48 pm (UTC)Judging from comments about the more recent episodes with less than a handful to go before the end, I think the present will be yet another recycled
scriptgift with no real feeling behind it. Perhaps there'll be a shiny bow on top, but that doesn't change what's inside.I think the original idea was to use an SGA movie and airings of the SG-1 movies as a "bridge" to the premiere of SGU, but they're so focused on the new baby, everything else has become the red-headed stepchild.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 06:13 pm (UTC)But... yeah. Atlantis was the red-headed stepchild when SG-1 was still on, it stayed the red-headed stepchild even after SG-1 went off the air, and it's still the red-headed stepchild now that they've got a new baby. Argh.
Of course, given that Mallozzi and Mullie are penning the SGA movie, I really don't hold any hope that it'll be good.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 08:13 pm (UTC)I am wondering: How many months were between the wrap of SG-1 and the first movie? I didn't watch the backgrounds of the shows then I have no clue. Maybe 4 months?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 12:31 am (UTC)Too bad they couldn't have the movie ready to premiere/promote at ComicCon. As if they'd care anyway. :\
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:06 am (UTC)Yeah to have the movie promoted at Comic Con would be great, that is, if they had it filmed...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 11:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 12:58 pm (UTC)